What a trouble it is!

As a disease that associates with wear and tear, aging, obesity, sleep disorders, high blood pressure and inflammation, it’s no wonder the incidence of atrial fibrillation continues to rise.

AF represents a huge health problem. For the individual patient, it can cause life-altering symptoms, increase the risk of stroke or weakened heart muscle and perhaps most troublesome: AF exposes patients to perilous treatments. It brings patients closer to doctors–which is always a risky proposition. For the healthcare system, AF treatment has grown more complex and expensive. There is both under-treatment, which leads to excessive disability from stroke and heart failure, as well as over-treatment, which leads to therapeutic misadventures too numerous to list here. There is a huge knowledge gap on how best to treat this disease.

Over the last decade, catheter ablation has offered patients with AF that won’t go away with medicines or lifestyle changes an opportunity for symptom relief. I’ve written many times about ablating AF. In brief, catheter ablation of AF entails electrically isolating areas of the atria (most often the muscle sleeves surrounding the pulmonary veins). The energy source most often used is radiofrequency energy–a burn. The problem with using RF energy to make electrical lines of block in the atria is that it’s hard to draw a line with dots. An electric fence made with dots tends to have gaps. And these gaps lead to reconnection of the veins and the need for redo ablation procedures.

So investigators, in Europe first, began experimenting with the use of freezing tissue rather than burning. Cryoballoons were developed that could be placed in the orifice of a pulmonary vein. Then, with a single freeze, an entire ring of ablation isolates the vein. Rather than making 20-30 encircling point RF lesions, a single freeze electrically isolates the vein.

Small observational trials and then one big randomized controlled trial (STOP-AF) reveal cryoballoon ablation compares favorably (in safety and efficacy) to RF ablation in patients with intermittent AF. (Though there have been no large trials comparing the technologies head-to-head.) The FDA approved the cryoballoon system and the technique has taken off in the US.

But with any procedure comes risk. Recently, you may have seen Dr Wes’ report on procedural deaths from cryoballoon ablation.

About 6 months ago, after an extensive (and I mean extensive) learning process, I began doing cryoballoon ablation. Why would I change a perfectly well-practiced RF ablation procedure? What are the safety issues? What about efficacy? How does the new generation cryoballoon compare with the first generation? What’s the take home on freezing versus burning?

I hope you want to read more over at theHeart.org. Here is the link:

How safe is cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation?

JMM

{ 0 comments }

Smarter people have weighed in on the sadness in Boston. I can’t help it. Writing helps me feel better.

I am really sorry for the people who have lost life or limb. As a parent, grandparent, scratch that, as a fellow human, just thinking about bombs and bullets hitting human bodies makes me want to cry. It’s as senseless as the rest of the world’s human-induced tragedies. Is evil any less sad across an ocean? In my blessed cocoon of a life, it’s hard to comprehend this level of evil.

I am fearful too.

Call me naïve, but I harbor little fear of crime and terrorism. Heck, on a statistical level, it is far riskier just driving home from work. (Think texting and driving).

What really frightens me is others’ fear. I dread the response. When people get scared, bad things happen: freedom is diminished; common sense is jettisoned and bad policies become accepted. A colleague today in the doctor’s lounge had it right: he used the word—marionettes.

Our airports are the easy example. Look at how US society has accepted the TSA farce. Illusion.

Never events that occur in the hospital are another example. Most recently, there was a sentinel event alert on hospital monitors. Alas, more policing (monitoring) actually made matters worse; it led caregivers to miss real alarms.

It pains me to write something so obvious, but what makes the US such an amazing place to live is freedom. The phrase, you don’t know what you have till it’s gone, keeps ringing in my head.

Oh, how I fear the loss of freedom that comes from the attempt to prevent rare events. Another word…futility.

Is our society coming apart? I don’t think so. The little history that I have studied suggests we live in a far more peaceful world. You don’t have to go back many years to witness much darker chapters in humanity.

That said, though, don’t you, too, worry about society’s grasp of common sense? For instance, why do we struggle so much with obviousness? Can there be no tolerable level of bad stuff? Perhaps we don’t do a good enough job teaching statistics and basic human nature. It’s just like in Medicine: too much alertness is often worse than too little.

This would be an easy week to be pessimistic about humans.

But one will fight pessimism. It’s bad for the blood vessels and stirs chronic inflammation.

So let’s hope.

I will hope that this great country will grow more tolerant, less insular and less polarized by religion and politics. I will hope that these sorts of failings of humanity teach us that the best way to live together on this planet is kindness and tolerance, not barricades, metal detectors and surveillance.

JMM

{ 3 comments }

How should doctors behave online? This is a funny question, isn’t it?

Medical establishment loves rules and hierarchy. Social media does not. Social media levels the playing field of who gets to talk; it gives real caregivers a voice. That’s very cool.

This is just a guess, but I suspect there are many more acts left to play out in the healthcare social media play. Here’s the latest: (h/t to my friend Larry Husten from Forbes.)

The American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards have gotten together and published a position paper on how doctors should behave on the “new frontier” of the Internet. At 14 pages and nearly 6000 words, this is one heck of a hefty instruction manual. The authors might have a tough time on Twitter and Facebook. (Insert grin.)

It’s got to be simpler. Of course it is.

Let’s start with a real case:

Years ago, early on in my blogging career, I wrote a post about a patient who presented to the ER with third degree heart block. She was dying before our eyes. As most doctors can attest, emergencies bring out the best in US healthcare. The patient was transferred immediately to the EP lab where I implanted a permanent pacemaker. She went home the next day alive and well. The teamwork that led to a life being saved made me tingle with delight. Adding to the joy was the fact that emergencies mandate jettisoning BS. You have to act first and check boxes later.

That night I sat down at the computer and celebrated the joy of doctoring with words. Mindful of privacy issues, I changed a number of details of the case (time, age and gender, for instance).

Then came “the comment”: My heart sank. Despite changing many of the specifics, a commenter thanked me for saving their family member. Though all were happy with the outcome, my attempt to maintain privacy had failed. This lesson has stuck with me.

With that “learning” case as a backdrop, here are my top-ten nuggets of wisdom on social media for caregivers:

  1. Do not fear social media. It’s an amazing tool for advancing the greater good. The voice of caregivers has never been more vital. I believe the greatest problem with medicine right now is not the lack of available treatments, but rather, a lack of patient education. Patients cannot truly share in decision-making unless they have “the real story.” Both patients and doctors are starved for candid unfiltered information. Social media does real, real well.
  2. Never post anything when angry. Never is a big word but it fits well here. Nothing further needs to be said. Just don’t do it. A corollary: Do not post while neurologically impaired: I’ve said some really dumb things in the haze that encompasses one right after a bike race. (Insert another grin.)
  3. Strive for accuracy: People will read what you post. I’ve written many times that blog posts are not journal articles, but that doesn’t mean you should get lazy with words. Here is the problem: You think electrophysiology is complicated. See what happens when you try being absolutely precise with the English language.
  4. When in doubt, pause. Sleep on it. Re-read. Remember the permanency of digital media. You are a doctor, not a journalist. You have time.
  5. Don’t post anything that can identify a patient. Changing details of the case is not enough. It’s especially important not to post in real-time. Avoid terms like, “this morning,” or “today.” It’s one thing to tell a story about a patient you saw two months ago; it’s yet another to talk about the patients you saw today. Don’t underestimate privacy.
  6. Ask permission: If you want to write about a specific case, get permission from the patient.
  7. Be respectful: Don’t say anything online that you wouldn’t say in person. If you are critical of someone pretend that you are going to run into him or her at a meeting next week. Put yourself in their shoes. Try to understand their position. You think they are conflicted; what about your conflicts? My wife once told that me that all unsolicited advice is self-serving. (Hoosiers are just so sensible.)
  8. Assume beneficence: I’ve been in healthcare for two decades and can testify that truly bad people are a rarity. Most of us aim to do what is right. Some say doctors are too protective of each other; but the thing about medicine is that it’s much easier to practice with a time machine. Social media tempts one to toss stones. Resist that urge.
  9. Be careful “friending” patients online. I say careful because I don’t like rules. Clearly, some patients can also be friends. The lines here are blurry. My attempt at a solution is to have a DrJohnM Facebook page and a regular John page. I try to steer patients to the professional page. I am also a bit old-fashioned with Facebook. I try to avoid posting compromising stuff—even though it would be fantasy to think doctors are any less human than non-doctors.
  10. Educate yourself and ask questions: One of the best references for caregivers interested in learning more about social media is Kevin Pho’s new book: Establishing, Managing, and Protecting Your Online Reputation: A Social Media Guide for Physicians and Medical Practices. Another nifty thing about social media is that many of the experts are approachable. If you email (or direct message) experts like Ves Dimov, Kevin Pho, Wes Fisher, Jay Schloss, Wendy Sue Swanson or Bryan Vartebedian, they are likely to respond with helpful tips. That’s nice. In my limited experience, healthcare social media is populated with nice people.

The bottom line is always the same: Success comes from mastery of the obvious. Common sense, decency, truth and admitting one’s mistakes will rarely steer you wrong.

JMM

P.S. Please feel free to add your own nuggets of wisdom in the comment section. I am 99.9% certain that there are more than just these ten.

{ 5 comments }

Stress is killing our hearts and bodies…But there is hope.

April 16, 2013 Atrial fibrillation

It’s an appropriate day to talk about stress. If you treat heart rhythm problems, you can’t miss the effects of stress. It matters so much. Both acute and chronic–though mostly chronic–stress wreaks havoc on the heart’s electrical system. And it’s not just the heart rhythm; the chronic inflammation that goes with long-lasting stress negatively impacts [...]

Read the full article →

As a novel communication tool, Social Media will improve doctoring.

April 12, 2013 Social Media/Writing/Blogging

Wendy Sue Swanson (or @SeattleMamaDoc) is a pediatrician, mother, wife, patient, caregiver and blogger. In the embedded video below, she speaks about the online revolution and the power of social media to enhance the good that doctors can do. I am a believer. What if you could read a post/tweet every time your doctor had [...]

Read the full article →

Monitors, patient safety and common sense

April 10, 2013 Health Care

Patient safety and hospital quality is a scary topic. I’ll go easy. I’m just a doctor. I don’t know much. Entire departments, filled with cubicles, computers and well-meaning people, now exist to keep hospitals tightly regulated and running perfectly. There is data to analyze, regulations to read, and oh so many meetings to attend. This [...]

Read the full article →